The Business Case For Psychological Health And Safety

Dr. Bill Howatt is the chief mental health officer and founder of Howatt HR.

Imagine walking into a workplace that feels like a fish tank: transparent, exposed and reactive to every ripple. Every interaction in this environment—how employees are treated, the culture they swim in and the psychological climate they experience—becomes either a drain or a charge on your workforce. These forces shape how people feel, think and ultimately perform. But many leaders still prioritize knowledge, skills and performance metrics, so they overlook the emotional undercurrents that drive employees.

My company, Howatt HR, has conducted applied workforce research to determine that, when employees feel safe, they can flourish. Performance improves, and costs related to absenteeism, disability, conflict and turnover decline.

Feelings Are Strategic, Not Soft

Feelings aren’t fluff. They shape our decisions and can be powerful predictors of both risk and performance. When measured and monitored, they reveal critical lead indicators of psychological safety, belonging and purpose. Employees who feel psychologically safe are more likely to take risks, admit mistakes, challenge ideas and learn. These behaviors are the bedrock of innovation and resilience. When employees feel a sense of purpose and belonging, they’re more motivated to do their best because the organization’s success becomes part of their sense of self-worth.

This is a simple concept I’m challenging more CEOs and CHROs to reflect on. A group of humans who experience more positive emotions will be more cost-effective over time and deliver better performance. But many organizations still operate from fear and control. They hit performance targets by focusing on what gets done, not how. The old saying “robbing Peter to pay Paul” plays out in workplaces where financial rewards mask emotional costs. The result? A workforce that may look productive but is quietly burning out.

The Hidden Cost Of Ignoring Feelings

The link between feelings and mental harm is direct. Employees who feel unsafe, excluded or undervalued are more likely to experience psychological strain, burnout, disengagement or clinical mental health conditions. But this isn’t just a human crisis; it is an economic one.

A 2024 Deloitte study found that the U.S. spends $477 billion on avoidable mental health expenses. In Canada, a 2023 BCG report estimated workplace-related mental health issues cost more than $220 billion annually. That figure includes $32 billion in public spending and $190 billion in indirect costs, such as absenteeism and reduced quality of life.

The return on investing in psychological health and safety is real. Since an initial report from the World Health Organization in 2016, multiple studies and cost calculators have found that every dollar invested in mental health yields a $4 return on improved health and productivity. While not every dollar guarantees results, laying the foundation for a Plan-Do-Check-Act psychological health and safety program can improve psychological safety and human potential.

The Human Potential Equation

Employers are starting to get the memo. Emotional adversity loads like stress and burnout are rising, and employees expect support. For younger employees, this matters more than compensation. They want to work for organizations that genuinely care about their well-being.

My thesis is that employees’ feelings predict their potential—and it’s measurable. It’s time to treat it as a strategic key performance indicator. That’s why I developed the Human Potential Equation, a predictive metric for estimating full-time equivalent (FTE) capacity based on three factors: ability, access and engagement. Ability reflects the skills and competencies an employee brings. Access measures the tools, resources and support available to do the job. Engagement captures the employee’s motivation and emotional connection to their work.

The equation was developed to help organizations move beyond traditional productivity metrics and better understand how to unlock human potential. Employers can use these three levers to monitor and improve workforce capacity, rating them on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). After scoring, leaders should be able to spot gaps (e.g., high ability but low access) and take action (e.g., offer training, improve support and create feedback loops to understand employee concerns).

Drains And Charges In Action

Let’s return to the idea that every workplace interaction either drains or charges employees. Over time, psychosocial hazards like unclear roles, isolation, excessive workload and lack of recognition can drain emotional well-being. In contrast, things like role clarity, supportive leadership, belonging, autonomy and purpose can energize, or charge up, employees.

Employees don’t just react to what happens; they absorb it. Their feelings become the lens through which they interpret their work, relationships and values. Repeated exposure to drains without enough charges leads to psychological injury. So, the question for any CEO is, “Do you understand that the way employees feel matters as a predictor of potential, performance and profit?”

Redefining ROI To Include Human Value

Return on investment isn’t just about hard dollars. It’s also about the value that employees assign to what they believe helps or hinders their ability to thrive. This shapes how they engage, how leaders show up and how culture is formed.

Psychological health and safety are the North Star, and reaching it requires more than policies. Employers need to demonstrate a genuine interest in how employees feel and experience the workplace. It’s not about shielding people from challenges. Like a good workout, discomfort can be productive, but not all strain is healthy. When unpleasant emotions are employees’ chronic state, they’re going to feel devalued, unappreciated, fearful or excluded. These emotions drain energy, erode trust and diminish performance.

What CEOs Must Ask Their HR Leaders

To unlock full-time equivalent capacity, I encourage CEOs to challenge their HR leaders by applying the Human Potential Equation and asking questions that reveal how well the organization enables people to thrive. Here are a few examples:

• How are we embedding psychological health and safety into daily operations?

• What behaviors define a thriving workplace—and how are we reinforcing them?

• Are we measuring impact, not just participation, in our people programs?

• Can we link our people investments to real business outcomes?

The answers will reveal whether your organization is truly unlocking human potential or just managing symptoms. To make a real impact, psychological health and safety must go beyond a compliance checkbox. It needs to be woven into the fabric of your culture.

Forbes Human Resources Council is an invitation-only organization for HR executives across all industries. Do I qualify?